Druski
Hold Those Accusing Him Responsible!!!
Serious Flaws in Allegations, Time for Accountability
Published
Druski is taking a stand not just against accusations of sexual assault but also demanding accountability from those who represent his accuser. He asserts that her claims are filled with serious inaccuracies, and he’s prepared to present evidence in court.
In a bold move, the comedian and actor filed legal documents on Friday in federal court, calling out Ashley Parham’s legal representatives. He presented a collection of evidence that he claims disproves her allegation that he raped her alongside Diddy and Odell Beckham Jr. on March 23, 2018, in Northern California.
Druski further reveals that Parham’s police report filed on the same day names a man known as Shane Pearce and mentions another unidentified white male as her assaulters. Interestingly, this document does not reference Druski, and he insists that this report was “easily accessible from public records.”
The insinuation is clear: If he could get his hands on the police report without any hassle, why were Ariel Mitchell and Shawn Perez, Parham’s lawyers, unable to do the same?
Beyond this glaring discrepancy in Parham’s allegation, Druski also provided several documents affirming he was home in Georgia with his mother at the time of the alleged incident. It’s important to mention that back in 2018, he wasn’t the celebrity he has since become.
He even mentioned that during this time, his only source of income was his job as a waiter, backing up his claim with documentation from Outback Steakhouse along with an application for a position at LongHorn Steakhouse. This young man had dreams!
As first reported by Nova Play Hip Hop, he has also included phone records in his filing demonstrating that all his calls from March 19 to March 30 came from Georgia. Additionally, his bank statement affirms a purchase made at a gas station in Georgia on March 23.
Ultimately, Druski emphasizes that a wealth of easily accessible evidence illustrates he was a staggering 3,000 miles away from Northern California, struggling financially as a 23-year-old without fame.
In light of these revelations, he is urging the court to impose sanctions on Mitchell and Perez, while also seeking dismissal from Parham’s lawsuit entirely.
In response, Parham’s attorney, Ariel Mitchell, stated to Nova Play, “We will vigorously defend our claims in court, as we have always intended. We eagerly await our day in the judicial spotlight.”
